CCOs will be under scrutiny on soft
dollars
Examiners are likely to put you on the spot
regarding soft dollars, fund experts say,
even as increased regulatory scrutiny dampens
their use.
John Gilner, CCO at
T. Rowe Price, concurs, because of the importance
to both the adviser and the fund board of
getting best execution. “That
to me is a pretty fundamental compliance issue,
and it is an issue which boards are very concerned
about right now, the ones that really are
paying attention to what's going on in the
market,” says Gilner. Last month, the Independent
Directors Council, an offshoot of the Investment
Company Institute, recommended that the SEC
adopt a rule requiring broker-dealers to unbundle
commissions and put a value on proprietary
research.
“It is entirely possible, and in the view
of many desirable, that this will lead to
the eventual elimination of the use of soft
dollars in the mutual fund industry,” James
Bodurtha, chairman of the IDC, wrote in a
letter to SEC chairman William Donaldson.
Bodurtha says adopting
the IDC recommendation could “create a market environment where we
can say to our traders, ‘Well, you guys are
paying X for this. Is it worth it?' And they
can say, ‘Yes, it is,' or, ‘We're not going
to buy it anymore now that we know what it
actually costs us.'”
Directors are asking
hard questions about just who benefits from
the research paid for by fund commissions,
Allan Mostoff says. The adviser “may be using that research for other
funds, it may be using it for its institutional
clients, it may be using it for its private
clients,” he says.
This creates a conflict of interest between
the adviser and the board, says Mostoff. The
role of the CCO is really to be a mediator between
the two on this issue. |